 |
Global Climate Change &
Bangladesh....
Erosion Dynamics or
Causes of Erosion
Whatever may be the net result of the accretion/erosion
process, it is very difficult to identify separately the
contribution to erosions due to different dynamic causes
of erosion. The main causes of coastal erosion in
Bangladesh are:
• Heavy discharge current
• High astronomical tides
• Strong monsoon water current
• High storm surges
A brief description on the possible impacts of SLR on
erosion via media the above- mentioned four major causes
of erosion in Bangladesh will be made here (Ali, 1989).
The erosion theory will be discussed in the next
section.
DISCHARGE CURRENT
A huge amount of water discharges through and from
Bangladesh into the Bay of Bengal. The main thrust is on
the Meghna estuary at the north-east corner of the Bay
of Bengal. The strong discharge current causes
considerable erosion in the coastal area. The SLR will
push the coastline as well as the river mouth landward
and is likely to modify the discharge current and hence
the erosion. The 1.5 m contour line is very near the
coastline in the Meghna estuary. The 4.5 m contour is
also quite near. As a result the gradient flow may
increase and also the erosion. However, there are a lot
of uncertainties about this. The mechanism thus needs to
be explored.
TIDE
Tide is another major cause of coastal erosion in
Bangladesh. It is mostly semi-diurnal in character and
shows an increase from the Indian coast in the west to
the Meghna estuary where it is the highest (range is as
high as 5 m or so on the average). Then the tide shows a
gradual decrease in the south-east direction along the
east coast of Bangladesh (Au, 1996). Tides in the Bay of
Bengal originate in the Indian Ocean and get amplified
at the Head Bay due mainly to nonlinear shallow water
effect and the northward convergence of the Bay of
Bengal. The high tidal water action thus contributes to
the erosion problem in Bangladesh. The rise in sea level
is likely to increase the tidal range in the Bangladesh
coast. This has been demonstrated by Flather and
Khandkar (1987) through numerical modelling.
Furthermore, the inundation due to SLR may increase the
nonlinear effect and hence increase the tidal range,
thereby increasing the erosion effect.
MONSOON CURRENT
The south-west monsoon wind that flows over the Indian
Ocean and the adjoining land areas generates strong
water waves and water current in the area. The water
waves and water current cause heavy erosions in
Bangladesh coast, particularly in the Meghna estuary
where water rises due to piling up of water by
south-west wind (Ali, 1995). The wind also stirs the
water in the shallow coastal area almost over the whole
depth. The result is erosion. The areas likely to be
inundated by SLR may be subjected to wind effect,
thereby causing more erosion in the area.
STORM SURGES
Storm surges are generated by cyclones forming in the
seas and oceans. Tropical cyclones forming in the Bay of
Bengal and the associated storm surges combined together
cause innumerable losses to the life and property in
Bangladesh. The storm surges in Bangladesh are among the
highest in the world. These are greatly responsible for
changes in the coastal configuration, causing erosion
and accretion. Global climate change and the sea level
rise are likely to influence the cyclone activity and
storm surge phenomenon. Possible impacts of climate
change and sea level rise in the context of Bangladesh
have been discussed, among others, by Johns and Ali
(1987), Flather and Khandkar (1987), Pramanik and Ali
(1989), Ali and Ahmad (1992) and Ali (1996). Ali (1996),
using a storm surge model for the Bay of Bengal, has
given different scenarios of cyclone and storm surge
activity in Bangladesh with respect to April 1991
cyclone that took a death toll of about 138,000 in
Bangladesh.
It may be said that if cyclone activities and storm
surges change due to climate change, the erosion problem
is likely to be more aggravated.
Theory of Erosion
Due to Sea Level Rise
The sea level rise is one of the driving mechanisms of
coastal erosion. While this has an indirect effect on
coastal erosion through the dynamical processes, it
itself has a direct contribution to erosion as well.
With a rise in water level, the coastal morphological
system will adjust itself to the high water level
situations by creating a new coastal profile at a higher
level at the coast of the presently existing coastal
profile. This process, as described by Vellinga (1986),
is as follows
a) By a rise in water level, the water line will shift
landward.
b) As the coastal profile becomes steeper, erosion will
occur until a new dynamic equilibrium is reached at a
higher level.
c) The natural filling rate of lagoons and tidal basins
will increase with an accelerated rise in sea level; the
sediments required for the filling will come largely
from the surrounding areas through erosion.
d) Rising sea level will cause a shoaling effect in
rivers as a consequence of which (shoaling) sediment
yields from rivers will reduce; these sediments will not
be available to compensate for any erosion in the
coastal area.
We shall discuss here the theory of erosion due to sea
level rise, following mostly the method developed by
Brunn (1962).
The erosion phenomenon due to sea level rise is depicted
in Figure-2. The figure shows the present coastal
profile with respect to the present mean sea level.
Higher sea levels will result in coastal recession
because the waterline will shift landward due to
submergence. Not only this, erosion will occur, as
pointed out before, until a dynamic equilibrium is
reached and a new coastal profile is formed. Figure-2
shows the new coastal profile under the future sea level
rise situation. The continuous line is the present
profile and the dotted line is the new profile after
rise in sea level and after quantitative balance between
shore erosion and bottom deposits. The eroded and
sedimented areas are shaded. Amount of sediments eroded
will be equal to the amount of sediments deposited,
assuming that eroded sediments are not lost (if lost,
then by an insignificant amount) into the deep sea.

If ‘a’ is the rise in water level due
to SLR, the quantity of sediments needed to re-establish
the same bottom profile over a shelf width, ‘b’, will be ‘ab’.
This quantity must be derived from the erosion of the
shore. This will give rise to a shoreline recession, ‘x’.
We consider that the shoreline is in longshore equilibrium
as indicated above. That means the same quantity of
material that is passing from the updrift side is also
passing out downdrift. If the elevation of the shore is
‘e’, the quantity eroded above sea level is ‘xe’. In the
meantime, in order to reestablish the original equilibrium
bottom-profile, the entire bottom profile must move
shoreward by the same distance, ‘x’, upto depth ‘h’, at
distance ‘b’ from the shoreline. The amount of eroded
sediments will be ‘x’ (e+h). Under a balance between the
eroded and deposited sediments, we have
x(e+h)=ab--------- (1)
or x = ab/(e+h)----(2)
Thus, if values of the parameters on the right hand side
of the above equation (2) is known, then the erosion due
to SLR can be calculated. The application of this formula
has given reasonable results for the Pacific and the
Atlantic coasts.
Ali and Ahmad (1992) and Au (1994) have made a rough test
of the formula for the west coast of Bangladesh. Using e =
1.0 m, h = 20 m, b = 60,000 m (typical of the west coast
of Bangladesh) and a = 1.0 crn/yr, it was found that the
formula gives a shoreline recession through erosion of
about 2.9 rn/yr. This value will be even larger for the
Meghna mouth where b is larger. The value x for west coast
is about 3000 times the SLR and seems to be very large
compared to other places in the world. For example,
erosion is about 100 times the sea level rise for the
Florida coast (Brunn, 1962). For Belgium to Denmark, the
erosion figure is estimated to be between 60-80 times the
SLR (Hekstra, 1989). Vellinga (1988) estimates that a sea
level rise of 1.0 m will cause an erosion of a sandy shore
in the order of 100-500 m. So it was concluded by Ali and
Ahmad (1992) that the Brunn’s formula is not suitable for
application to Bangladesh.
However, the conclusion by Ali and Ahmad (1992) was based
on the rough estimate for the west coast of Bangladesh
where the continental shelf is very wide and gently
sloping. In fact, as stated by Brunn (1962), and as it
appears from the equation, the formula is valid and more
applicable for an area with a steep bottom profile.
Additionally, as stated by Leatherman (personal
discussion) the Brunn’s formula is more applicable for
sandy- shores. Such a situation exists on the eastern (Chittagong-Cox’s
Bazar) coast of Bangladesh. The data collected and results
given in this report refer to the east coast of
Bangladesh. So the present study concentrates on the
application of Brunn’s formula for the eastern sandy shore
of Bangladesh
In passing, it may be of some use to have a feel of the
erosion numbers for Bangladesh under different SLR
scenarios. Using an erosion range of 100 to 500 times the
SLR, Ali and Ahmad (1992) have made some estimates of
erodible areas in Bangladesh due to SLR. This is given in
the Table-1.
TABLE 1 : Erosion due to SLR for two
different erosion rates (area in sq. kin)
|
SLR
(in) |
Erosion = 100 times
SLR |
Erosion = 500 times
SLR |
|
1.5 |
55 |
275 |
|
3.0 |
265 |
1,375 |
|
4.5 |
447 |
2,235 |
Source: Ali and
Ahmad, 1992
Erosion Situation in
Bangladesh
Erosion is a worldwide phenomenon. About 70% of the
world’s coastline has shown a net erosion over the past
few decades, less than 10% has net degradation and the
remaining 20% or so have remained relatively stable (Bird,
1985). For Bangladesh, studies are scattered depending on
the particular purposes in most of the cases. A brief
overview of some of the accretion - erosion studies done
for Bangladesh coast is given below:
Miah (1975) made a qualitative discussion on the accretion
and erosion problem in the Meghna estuary covering the
period 1779-1975. Jabbar (1979) made a qualitative
assessment of accretion/erosion by comparing the Survey of
India Map of 1931 and a Landsat map of 1977. It was found
that during the period a net accretion of 493 km2 took
place in the mainland. This was however the result of the
building of a cross dams for reclamation of land. Erosions
were observed in a major islands, namely Bhola (accretion
85 km2 and erosion 376 kin2) Hatiya (accretion 64 km2 and
erosion 172 kin2), Sandwip (accretion 35 km2 and erosion
227 kin2). During the period, many small chars such as
Char Udaykal and Char Clark were completely eroded and
some new chars like Char Dhal, Char Shabani, Nijhumdwip
were fonned.
Pramanik et al., (1981) made a comparative study of seven
different maps of the coastal region between 1779 and
1979. The results of the study are summarised in Table-2.
It is observed that while the islands Hatiya, Sandwip,
Shahbazpur, Manpura and others decreased in area, the
mainland increased in size due to construction of cross
dams. It is to be noted that around 1950 Hatiya island got
larger and then it broke into two islands, the northern
one joined the mainland.
TABLE 2 : Land area in the Meghna
Estuary (in sq. kin)
|
Year Map
Source Hatiya Sandwip Shabazpur Manpura
Others Mainland Total |
|
1779 Delta of Ganges 370 479 730 179
150 2789 4697
(Rennel)
1896 Survey of
India
469 502 800 39
60 2370 4240
1945 Survey of India 1070
500 549 70
70 2650. 4909
1959 Aerial 1030
391 339 80 101
2650 4591
Photograph
1973 Landsat-1 399
290 300 119 91
3900 5099
1976 Landsat-2 399
269 300 130 98
3999 5195
1979 Landsat-3 370
290 347 119 70
4100 5296 |
Source: Prnmanik
et at. 1981
A detailed computer analysis of Landsat
data for the years 1972 and 1979 was made by Pramanik
(1983) for the coastal region. This study, however, showed
a net accretion of land by about 213 km2 during the period
1972-79. Erosion was observed to be taking place in the
north-eastern part of Bhola, northern part of Hatiya and
north-western part of Sandwip.
A SPARRSO (1987) study on coastal dynamics of Bangladesh
for the period 1960-84 showed a net erosion. The amount of
land accreted and eroded for major islands is given in
Table-3, which shows a net loss of about 844 km2.
TABLE 3 : Change
detection study for the period 1960-84 (in sq. kin)
|
Name of Island |
Accretion |
Erosion |
Net Result |
|
Bhola |
80.06 |
360.76 |
280.70 (Erosion) |
|
Hatiya |
30.86 |
108.44 |
77.58 (Erosion) |
|
Sandwip |
0.0 |
110.46 |
110.75 (Erosion) |
|
Manpura |
21.29 |
99.30 |
78.45 (Erosion) |
|
Sundarbans area |
78.02 |
375.65 |
297.63 (Erosion) |
Source: SPARRSO
Report, 1987
A study by Pramanik (1988) compared the
Landsat imagery of 1972 and 1987 and found that major
erosion occurred at south-eastern and southern part of
Sandwip, northern part of Hatiya and north-eastern and
north-western part of Bhola. A summary representation of
this study is given in Table-3. The chars and islands show
a net erosion. A total of 11 chars/islands totally
disappeared. About 40% of the land accreted in the
mainland appeared to have come from the reduction of river
widths which seems to be precarious for flood discharge
because this may slow down the discharge of flood water
into the Bay of Bengal.
TABLE
4 : Areas of
mainland and char/islands and number of chars/islands in
1973 and 1987 (in sq. km)
|
Item |
1973 |
1987 |
1973-1987 |
|
Mainland |
19,498 |
19,996 |
498 (accretion) |
|
Chars/islands |
3,534 |
3,338 |
196 (erosion) |
|
No. of chars/islands |
50 |
39 |
11 (loss) |
Source :
Pramanik 1988
Siddique (1988) has given some erosion
rates for different islands. This rate had been about 150
rn/year between 1940 and 1982 for Hatiya. The northern tip
of Hatiya which was almost stable during 1940-63 showed a
severe erosion rate of about 400 rn/year during 1963-82.
The Sandwip island had a rate of erosion of about 200 rn/year
between 1913 and 1963 which increased to 350 rn/year
during 1963-84.
MCSP (1992) made an accretion/erosion study for the whole
coastal region of Bangladesh. The study made a review of
maps of the last few hundred years and made a comparison
of eroded and accreted land between the years 1971 and
1991. The study also made a prediction/projection of
erosion and accretion in the coastal area of Bangladesh
for the next 25 years.
In a later work undertaken by SPARRSQ (1993), accretion
and erosion were studied for (i) the entire coast, (ii)
the Megbna estuary and (ii) two small islands - Srizonee
and Char Montaz. The study period considered was 1976-90
and the study was made using remotely sensed data. The
results of study are shown in Table-5. It is seen that
accretion and erosion in the entire region as well as in
the Meghna estuary are comparable. But accretion is quite
significant in Srizonee and Char Montaz and in the
surrounding areas.
TABLE 5 : Comparative statement of
erosion and accretion
|
Location
Scale
Period Erosion (sq. kin)
Accretion (sq. km) |
|
Entire
coast
1:500,000 1976-1990 858
808
The Meghna Estuary 1:250,000 1976-1990 764
744
Srizonee and surroundings 1:50,000
1984-1990 24
58
Char Montaz and
1:50,000
1984-1990
5
39
surroundings |
Source: SPARRSO, 1993
It is apparent from the above-mentioned studies on
accretion and erosion that neither accretion nor erosion
is of alarming rate. Both are compensating each other to
a reasonable extent.
Source: Huq. S., karim, Z., Asaduzzaman,
M., Mahtab, F., 1999, Vulnerability and Adaptation to
Climate Change for Bangladesh, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, The Netherlands. |
 |