Delineating sea territories is a must under the United
Nations Law of the Sea and any nation which signed the UN
Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS)
will have to submit to the UN the details of its sea
territories by October 2004 (Press
Release SEA/1792). Bangladesh ratified the UNCLOS in 2001, some 19 years after the convention was
signed at the UN. But it is yet to implement the
provisions of the convention, including leaving its sea
territories un-demarcated.
The definition of the
continental shelf and the criteria by which a coastal
State may establish the outer limits of its continental
shelf are set out in article 76
of the Convention. In addition, the Third United
Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (the
"Conference") adopted on 29 August 1980 the "Statement of
Understanding" concerning a specific method applicable to
such special features as those in the southern part of the
Bay of Bengal. This Statement is contained in
Annex II to the Final Act
of the Conference.The term "continental shelf" is
used by geologists generally to mean that part of the
continental margin which is between the shoreline and the
shelf break or, where there is no noticeable slope,
between the shoreline and the point where the depth of the
superjacent water is approximately between 100 and 200
metres. However, this term is used in article 76 as a
juridical term. According to the Convention, the
continental shelf of a coastal State comprises the
submerged prolongation of the land territory of the
coastal State - the seabed and subsoil of the submarine
areas that extend beyond its territorial sea to the outer
edge of the continental margin, or to a distance of 200
nautical miles where the outer edge of the continental
margin does not extend up to that distance. The
continental margin consists of the seabed and subsoil of
the shelf, the slope and the rise. It does not include the
deep ocean floor with its oceanic ridges or the subsoil
thereof.
According to article 76, the coastal State may
establish the outer limits of its juridical continental
shelf wherever the continental margin extends beyond 200
nautical miles by establishing the foot of the continental
slope, by meeting the requirements stated for the
thickness of sedimentary rocks, by satisfying
geomorphological requirements and by meeting distance and
depth criteria, or by any combination of these methods
(Article 76, paragraphs 4 - 7).
A resource-poor country with a huge population,
Bangladesh must make the most of whatever resources it is
able to lay claim to within its geographical boundary. As
the Bay of Bengal washes against Bangladesh’s shores, the
country is also rich in marine resources. According to
international law, we have an exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
that extends 200 nautical miles into the sea. The sea is
rich in minerals and a wealth of aquatic resources in
addition to fishes. But we are yet to prepare ourselves to
tap our marine resources. Being a large deltaic plain, the
rivers that flow across the country from the north to the
south and then into the Bay of Bengal deposit silts at
their mouths.
Bangladesh has 12 nautical miles of maritime boundary
and 200 nautical miles of exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Unfortunately, Bangladesh till date is not in a position
to use its claimed EEZ as it has not fulfilled the
provisions spelt out in the UN maritime charter.
The process, which is going on over the millennia, has
caused to form many small islands not far from the coastal
line. The South Talpatty comprises two such newly emerging
islands. Those islands lie at the mouth of Hariabhanga
River which also delimit the common border between
Bangladesh and India in that area. The newly formed
islands, which are known as South Talpatty in Bangladesh
while as New Moore in India, were discovered by a US
satellite in 1974. Coincidentally, in order to demarcate
the land boundary between the two countries, Bangladesh
signed an agreement with India in that year.
The issue of South Talpatty, being a subject of
maritime boundary talks, Bangladesh claims to have
discussed it when one of its ministers called on the-then
Indian prime minister Morarji Desai in May 1979. Desai,
reportedly, agreed to conduct a joint survey to demarcate
those islands. But things became complicated about a year
later when the Indian government under prime minister
Indira Gandhi claimed that the two small islands it calls
New Moore belonged to India. The matter, despite
Bangladesh’s repeated claim that it is the real owner of
the South Talpatty islets, is still hanging in the balance
because a maritime boundary agreement between the two
countries is yet to be concluded.
In geophysical terms, according to experts, under
Article 76 of the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea
which prescribes determination of territorial/continental
shelf claims under sea-water “on the basis of sedimentary
thickness”, Bangladesh has a solid claim on the Bengal
Deep Sea Fan that for millennia have been spreading the
annual deposit of silts from the three major eastern
Himalayan river systems draining through Bangladesh to
invade the sea-bed of the Bay of Bengal and extend right
up to Sri Lanka.
It is not only about the many disputed territories like
the South Talpatty islands that Bangladesh is yet to take
a decision as required by the UN Convention on the Law of
the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982 to which Bangladesh is a
signatory. But with its territorial waters still remaining
undemarcated, Bangladesh will be hard put to stake its
claim not only for the disputed islands, but also for its
exclusive economic zone.
|